Iakohakowa: ‘Ole Man Pete Never Quits Trying to Flood out Indigenous’

Border, Seaway & industrial pollution run through Akwesasne Mohawk territory. Photo: Sandra CuffeBorder, Seaway & industrial pollution run through Mohawk territory in Akwesasne. Photo: Sandra Cuffe

**************************************************

Ole Man Pete Never Quits Trying to Flood out Indigenous

by Iakohakowa, July 22, 2009

from the Eagle Watch listserv: eaglewatch@npogroups.org
Ole Man Pete aka F. Pierre Gingras never seems to quit.  One of the head

technical and economic engineers behind the James Bay Hydro Projects in northern Quebec, he figures he can always succeed in his insane schemes.  Pete worked at Hydro Quebec for 30 years to dam the rivers in Cree territory and build numerous hydro power stations.  He helped create a handful of Cree hydro sheiks while destroying the traditional Cree way of life.  Now a retired busy body, he wants to divert three more mighty northern rivers and send what he calls “surplus” water south to the U.S.  This would affect not only the people in Cree territory but also in Algonquin and Haudenosaunee territory.  Animals and plants in these territories would be endangered and could be exterminated. Ole Pete calculates there is enough “wasted” water flowing into James Bay that could be sold to over 150 million people.  If each household paid just $50/year, he and Quebec could make piles of $money$.

It’s an old plan from at least the 1930’s. It gets periodically revived by people like Tom Kierans and Louis Desmarais of GRANDCo.  This time around, the ole man Gingras is backed by the Montreal Economic Institute and the Desmarais family, some of Canada’s wealthiest billionaires.  These people have made their fortunes plundering Turtle Island and robbing us Indigenous.

Ole man Pete’s been at this latest mad plot since at least 2004 putting forth articles and studies on water diversion.  His team of engineering experts have been revising the Grand Canal scheme into what they say is a more economically viable and environmentally safe plan.  It’s now known as “L’Eau du Nord” or “Northern Waters”.

His main concern is that the U.S. will come and take the water, by force if necessary, when they get desperate enough.  He refers to the old mass murderer, Henry Kissinger himself when he says wars are already being fought over water. Court battles are already being waged in the US as the drought widens.    What Pete really wants is to make more money any way he can.

Huge swaths of farmland in the U.S. are now experiencing widening drought conditions.  California declared a state of emergency this year with drought there into its fourth year.  Farmers have been forced to stop cultivation after being denied up to half their annual water allowance.  Southern California has always been dry but people like the warm climate.  Farming, there has been accomplished with irrigation for over a century.  Fruit like peaches and apricots and vegetables like squash and broccoli are exported all over North America.  You may be eating some of them.

The drought conditions exist all across the south – Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas and even Florida.  The agricultural area in central Mexico is also experiencing drought.  The prairie provinces of Saskatchewan and Alberta are very dry this year, affecting grain crops like wheat and oats and hay for livestock feed.  It looks like it’s getting worse.

With people flocking to the pleasant warm dry climate, many southern US cities are also demanding more water.    For people in the Great Lakes area, this is hard to imagine.  The Great Lakes is the largest surface freshwater in the world.

In April, 2008 ole man Pete sent a letter to the Internationl Joint Commission IJC promoting the big water diversion scheme.  Set up in 1909, the IJC handles water issues between the US and Canada.

Pete sent the English version of his letter to IJC headquarters Frank Bevacqua in Washington, DC and the French version to the Commission Mixte Internationale, Gregg McGillis in Ottawa.  He attaches a document called “L’Eau du Nord Project Synopsis” which summarizes his privately financed conceptual study.

Bilingual readers may notice there is a difference in at least one line of the letter.  The English version claims the project will give “the Government of Quebec an extremely important financial margin.”  The French version says it will “apportant aussi aux gouvernement du Quebec and de l’Ontario une marge financiere forte importante…”

Ole man Pete thinks he has all the bases covered, including the legal aspect. He writes, “The international legal framework in force between Canada and the U.S. would prohibit the water diversion towards US, starting from basins bordering Canada.”  He is referring to the Great Lakes Water Compact which, like a sieve, cannot hold water.

He continues, “However, it seems it would not prohibit the bringing of additional exterior contributions or to use these same basins for the moving of these new external water contributions. The project would thus be apparently legal, as is, within the current legislative framework.”

He also wants to see the “amending of constitutive law of Hydro-Quebec to add from now on the sale of water to that of energy.”  He’d like to see Bechtel involved in his project.

Pete foresees a “possible dam in Montreal on the St.Lawrence River, suggested by the Authority of Le Havre of Montreal to prolong the basin of La Prairie [ten minutes from the Mohawk community of Kahnawake] to Sainte Helene Island, thus creating a vast nautical recreotouristical basin”.  The water would then flow back into the Great Lakes instead of flowing out to the Atlantic Ocean. How many Indigenous and mostly poor people would be flooded out along the way?

Pete’s original plan has the water redirected from three northern undeveloped rivers, the Bell, Waswanipi and Broadback flowing south into the Ottawa River through a series of canals.  Then it would be diverted to Lake Huron via the Nipissing River and Lake Nipissing.  His revised plan has it all going down the Ottawa to hit the dam at Montreal.  He plans 22 new dams and power stations with 1/2 of them along the Ottawa.

On July 15, 2009, the Montreal Economic Institute MEI published an editorial by Pete which was taken up by the National Post.  His latest synopsis, “Northern Waters: A realistic, sustainable and profitable plan to exploit Quebec’s blue gold” is available at the MEI web site.  It’s a special edition of their Economic Notes in English only.

Helene Desmarais, businesswoman and wife of Paul Desmarais Jr., is the chair of the institute.    The 13 directors include Marcel Boyer and Leon Courville, two economists with degrees from the US Carnegie Mellon University and Stephan Cretier, head of Garda World Security Corporation.

Garda has offices in major cities all across the land including at Val d’Or, Quebec.  Garda does armored transportation of currency and valuables, cash logistics, protection of persons and premises, physical security, consulting and investigations and electronic security solutions.  They guard mine sites, hydro and nuclear power stations, banks and VIP like Barack Obama.  They’re all set to take on guarding the water diversion.

For those who say it will never happen, there are precedents.  The St. Lawrence Seaway was first proposed in 1895 but not completed until 1959, over 60 years Grelater.    It made the St. Lawrence deeper so that ships could travel all the way to Thunder Bay on the western end of Lake Superior.  Grain, iron ore and coal are the main goods shipped along the Seaway.  About 6,500 people were relocated during its construction.  Many of them were Mohawks.  Thousands of acres of good farmland were flooded.

In his latest document, ole Pete Gingras figures the project will cost only $15billion, much less than Kierans Grand Canal scheme, estimated at $100 billion.  Pete thinks his plan can be completed by 2022.  They’re not in a big rush because the water crisis isn’t critical enough yet to be profitable. Xstrata, a Swiss company, needs til about 2013 to dig up all the copper and zinc they are mining near Matagami, Quebec.  Domtar also needs time to cut down all the rest of the trees that would otherwise be flooded.

The Grand Canal project would have seen James Bay turned into a lake.  Gingras’ revised plan intends to block the rivers upstream and create a basin stretching between Matagami and Mistissinni.  Val d’Or would be on the southwestern edge. Chibougamau and Waswanipi would be flooded.  These two towns with combined population of about 10,000 currently depend on tourism, fishing and logging to survive.  Since 1957, over 44 million tons of gold and silver have been mined out near Matagami.  The toxic tailings ponds they left behind will likely be flooded too.

Gingras’ plan is insane and destructive.

Firstly, what he calls “surplus” water is part of the natural cycle of spring floods, needed for many species’ survival.  This includes the traditional Cree people living off the land.  No one can forget the horrible picture of 10,000 drowned caribou who got stranded in previous diversions for hydro development. The huge protest movement against the James Bay development was overwhelmed by multinational corporate interests.

What does Gingras know about the spring runoff going into the sea where species depend on the natural level of salination?  His lunatic scheme could cause the ocean to become too salty.  Who can predict what awful consequences this could lead to?  Mother Earth has natural cycles that humans don’t understand.  Too much human interference on such a grand scale  could be disastrous!

Ole Gingras claims the flooded area or basin would not be very large and thus not harmful to the environment.  His basin looks as big as Lake Ontario itself. That sounds like a lot of water to us.  Artificially raising and lowering water levels would destroy fish spawning habitat and kill the fish.  Many Cree and Algonquins still depend on fishing for their food.

Pete says there would be no damage from mercury because the water wouldn’t sit for long.  What he forgets is there wouldn’t be any fish to be contaminated with mercury anyhow.

It’s uphill all the way to Amos in Algonquin territory.  This would require a lot of power to pump the estimated 25billion cubic meters of water to the top of the hill.

How does Pete figure all this water could then be sent down the Ottawa River without flooding and damage along the way?  Chalk River Laboratories is on the Ottawa River.  There’s a lot of nuclear waste stored there, some of it underground.  What would happen if there were a flood?  Annual spring flow varies from year to year, more so with climate change.

We condemn ole man Pete Gingras’ schemes as utter madness.  You know he’s a real sneak when he claims that “Quebec could export a large quantity of freshwater – without one drop having to leave the province”.  How does he figure that one?

If he didn’t have all that money behind him, his ideas could be quickly dismissed.  He keeps on trying to get the project going.  Water continues to be wasted and polluted by careless humans, causing a water shortage to grow.  The economic crisis means people desperate for work.  This demented and destructive plan must be stopped.

Iakohakowa

[Consider printing and sharing this report with your cyberphobic family and friends.]

Toronto, April 26: AN EXAMINATION OF THE CANADIAN MINING INDUSTRY

Toronto, April 26: The Question of Sustainability

Toronto, April 26: The Question of Sustainability

WHAT: 1 day conference about mining issues within Canada and abroad

WHEN: Sunday, April 26, 2009, 10:00am – 7:30pm

WHERE: Earth Sciences, Room 1050 (ES 1050), University of Toronto, 5 Bancroft Avenue

Moderated by Judy Rebick

$10 (sliding scale) to cover cost of meals; free for students. No registration required. Donations gladly accepted (available seating for 400 in auditorium).

Hosts: UTERN, Science for Peace, Students Against Climate Change / Toronto Mining Support Group, Aboriginal Students Association of York University

With the intention of building a movement for change within Canada we are hosting a conference on mining issues at the University of Toronto. This conference will provide the space for people within Canada to interact with affected communities and each other, and the conference format prioritizes facilitating conversations focused on solutions to ending corporate impunity.

“The Question of Sustainability” is a conference dedicated to examining the Canadian mining industry through the lens of sustainability within ecosystems, human rights, culture, and economics.

Featuring speakers from Papua New Guinea, Chile, the Congo, Guatemala, Tanzania and Peru, as well as many First Nations speakers and academics from Canada. This conference brings together indigenous people from the global south and the global north, and serves to address some of the complex social, political and environmental issues that relate to the imposition of extractive industries on traditional cultures.

Major issues include water use and contamination, human rights violations by Canadian companies operating abroad, the question of corporate social responsibility, and the autonomy and preservation of traditional cultures.

Endorsements: Amnesty International, Indigenous Education Network, Sierra Club Youth program

If you would like to table at the event or become a sponsor email indra@pantropy.net

Note: Special guests from the Ardoch Algonquin First Nation will conduct a three hour role-playing workshop.
_____________________

Schedule

10:00 a.m. – Introductions, opening ceremony

10:30 a.m. – Open plenary speaker

———

11:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. – FIRST BREAKOUT SESSION

- Historic Perspectives on Mining
- Mining in the Congo
- Mining and Health
- Resource Economics in developing countries
- Indigenous Issues and Mining

1pm – 2pm lunch break

1pm – 4pm: Concurrent with lunch: Role-playing workshop with Ardoch Algonquin leadership begins – Limited space available, so sign-up on the day of the conference!

2pm-4pm – SECOND BREAKOUT SESSION

- Human Rights: Issues with mine security
- ¡MesoAmerica Resiste! presentation by Beehive Collective
- Women’s issues in Mining
- Funding the destruction: TSX, Pension Funds, and Corporate Welfare
- Mining and Water

4:15 – 5:15pm – SOLUTIONS break-out session

*CSR/legislation* A discussion of the CSR framework and current legislation related to mining issues.
*Popular Education* A discussion of how to build awareness within our communities about mining issues, in a way that engages people and builds off the knowledge that they already possess.
*Legal Battles* A discussion about the use of lawsuits as a way of demanding accountability within Canada and beyond.
*Direct Action!* A discussion of how Direct Action is used in various campaigns.
*Shareholder Activism/Divestment* A discussion of different tactics engaging with shareholders, institutional holders, and “ethical” mutual funds.
*Referendums and accessing International Institutions (recommended for affected communities!)* Learn first hand about successful community-based tactics to defending community rights against mining companies. Learn from first hand experiences about engaging the UN, the ILO and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.

———

5:30 p.m. -7:30 p.m. – Closing Plenary
_____________________

If you would like to table at the event or become a sponsor email indra@pantropy.net

Event blog

_______________________

About the speakers

Jethro Tulin, CEO, Akali Tange, concerning the Porgera mine, Enga Province, Papua New Guinea.

Native to the rocky highlands of Papua New Guinea (PNG), Jethro Tulin is a popular organiser and founder of the Akali Tange Association (ATA), a human rights organization documenting abuses at the Porgera mine, owned by Toronto’s Barrick Gold.

Jethro has been organizing within and outside the Barrick’s Porgera mine since its inception (then owned by Placer Dome. In 1989, he registered Porgera’s first mine workers union and became its first secretary. Years later, after spending time abroad and involved in other aspects of Papua New Guinea’s nascent union movement, Jethro returned to Porgera to find the situation with the mine and the surrounding villages had worsened dramatically. So, in 2003, he founded the ATA, which has operated in Porgera with an all-volunteer staff and material support from friends, victims’ relatives, and even local businessmen and officials.

Jethro can be seen in this video:

Bob Lovelace, representative of the Ardoch Algonquin First Nation

Bob Lovelace was born into a line of Tslagi Indians through his great grandparents Mungle, grandfather, and mother, a heritage he honours. Bob attended cultural school as a child, joined AIM for several years while at University, and in Fall 1979 joined AAFN’s Honourary Chief Harold Perry to research, negotiate, and then launch an uncompromising legal defence of the wild rice stands near Ardoch Algonquin land. He has stood strong with many allies and friends in this “Rice War.” For nearly 25 years Bob has remained a steadfast and determined representative for the Algonquin communities of Ardoch, Sharbot Lake and many others, seeking to invigorate a sense of dignity and freedom in all Algonquin Peoples . . . Bob is a teacher to those wishing to learn more about tradition and ceremony. He is in addition an eloquent spokesman for Native rights, utilizing both English and Algonquin languages.

Lovelace is most well-known outside the Ardoch Algonquin community for his stand against uranium mining, for which he incarcerated in 2008 with no objection from the Province of Ontario at the time.

Sergio Campusano, leader of the Diaguita Descent Community Los Huasco Altinos in Chile.

Since he assumed the role of president, Sergio has been fighting against the greed of the mining corporations and the local agriculture companies in order to mantain the rights of his People. He has participated pressing charges in countless times even against the Chilean State and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. He’s conscious they’re fighting not only to represent the living, but the ancestral thought of preservation of the ecosystem for the entire world, for the children of us all. In this clear idea is impregnated the principles of AUTO-DESTINY, AUTONOMY, and the right of the indigenous peoples of AUTODETERMINATION.

(to be continued)
_____________________________

Additional links:

Porgera Alliance, Papau New Guinea (presenter)

Sergio Campusano, Pueblo Diaguita Huascoaltinos (presenter)

Rosalia Paiva, practitioner of Pachamama (presenter)

Save Lake Cowal campaign (by Skype, possibly)

Judy Rebick (moderator)

Lorraine Rekmans (presenter)

Jimmy Dick, Eaglehart Singers (presenter)

Video of Rights Action protest outside Goldcorp AGM

Luis Faura, Councilperson from Alto del Carmen

Mining photojournalist Allan Lissner (presenter)

Beehive Collective (tabler, presenter)

Ulises Garcia, vetran of community resistance to mining in Latin America (presenter)

Sakura Saunders (presenter)

Protest Barrick (tabler)

Grahame Russell, Rights Action (presenter)

Francois Guindon, Rights Action (presenter)

Carlos Amador, Siria Valley Environmental Committee, Honduras (presenter)

Justin Poder (Presenter)

FAO Montreal
Youtube video of Enrique River (invited speaker)

Article by Chris Reid. lawyer for KI Six, AAFN (presenter)

Bob Lovelace, Whitefish Lake First Nation (presenter)

Asad Ismi, journalist, creator of The Path of Destruction, a radio documentary on Canadian mining (tabler, presenter)

Global Aware (tabler)

Rainforest Action Network, tar sands campaign (tabler)

Willi Nolan, Bodia Machuria and Martin Kijazi (presenters at the Congo workshop)

Christian Peña

For information the role of Canadian mining companies in the Congo see the MiningWatch Canada website.

Écosociété, publisher of Noir Cananda

CCAMU

Tar Sands Watch

Science for Peace, University of Toronto chapter (host)

Students Against Climate Change To. Mining Support Group (host)

___________________________

“Canada does not yet have laws to ensure that the activities of Canadian mining companies in developing countries conform to human rights standards, including the rights of workers and of indigenous peoples.”

– Canada’s Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Trade. June 2005

“Canadian mining companies are taking advantage of [inadequate and poorly enforced regulatory controls] to expand into all corners of the globe, manipulating, slandering, abusing, and even killing those who dare to oppose them, displacing Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities alike, supporting repressive governments and taking advantage of weak ones, and contaminating and destroying sensitive ecosystems.”

– Jamie Kneen, MiningWatch Canada. November 2006

LOVE,EARTH?!: Global Response denounces Wal-Mart’s false claims of “sustainable” gold jewelry

CONTACT: Visit www.globalresponse.org; www.gbrw.org; www.wsdp.org

Paula Palmer, Global Response, 303 444-0306 ext 103, paula@globalresponse.org

Dan Randolph, Great Basin Resource Watch, 775.348.1986, dan@gbrw.org

Larson Bill, Western Shoshone Defense Project, 775.744-2565, wsdp@igc.org

Groups Charge Wal-Mart with “Greenwashing”

“Love,Earth” Gold is Tarnished

Boulder, CO: Environmental watchdog group Global Response announced today that it filed complaints with Consumers Union and the Federal Trade Commission, charging that Wal-Mart’s “green” claims for its “Love,Earth” jewelry are false.

“It is unconscionable that instead of addressing the planet’s serious environmental problems, Wal-Mart hoodwinks consumers into thinking they can ‘reduce impact on human health and the environment’ by buying gold jewelry,” says Global Response’s executive director Paula Palmer

The mines in Utah and Nevada and the factories in Peru and Bolivia where Wal-Mart claims its gold for Love,Earth is “sustainably mined and manufactured” are not monitored or certified by any credible independent agent.

“Wal-Mart has chosen to publicly endorse mining operations which have significant problems,” says Dan Randolph, executive director of the Nevada-based Great Basin Resource Watch. “These mines emit unacceptable quantities of mercury into the air, threatening the health of fetuses and young children. They deplete water quantity in an arid region, and they will go on contaminating water with toxic metals for centuries to come.”

Denver-based Newmont Mining Company mines Love,Earth’s gold on Western Shoshone lands without the permission of the Western Shoshone. “Wal-Mart claims its jewelry comes from ‘community friendly sources,’” says Larson Bill of the Western Shoshone Defense Project. “But they’ve never talked to us, and we’re the community affected by Newmont’s mines. They should meet with us. We need an independent health study here to show how these mines are affecting our people.”

Wal-Mart’s Love, Earth logo is encircled by the words, the “reduce, reuse, recycle, respect.” But mining is an extractive, non-renewable industry that is, by definition, unsustainable. A single gold ring leaves behind as much as 20 tons of waste rock and tailings that continue to pollute ground water even after the mine has stopped operations.

“The only sustainable gold is recycled gold – your grandmother’s wedding ring remade into a new piece. When Love,Earth jewelry is made entirely of recycled gold, it will earn its name. Until then,” says Global Response’s Palmer, “don’t believe it, and don’t buy it.”

#####################################

SEE THE GLOBAL RESPONSE WEBSITE FOR MORE INFO… and ACTION!

This Global Response Action was issued at the request of and with information provided by the Western Shoshone Defense Project (www.wsdp.org) and Great Basin Resource Watch (www.gbrw.org). For more information about Wal-Mart, see www.loveearthinfo.com, www.wakeupwalmart.com and www.walmartwatch.com. For more information about the impacts of gold mining, see www.minesandcommunities.org and www.nodirtygold.org. Special thanks to George Blevins for his drawings.

PERU: Indigenous Occupations End with Victory in Congress

On August 22nd, the Peruvian Congress repealed two legislative decrees at the root of the indigenous demonstrations that paralyzed various roads and energy installations from August 9th through 20th. The indigenous movement of the Amazon, home to 65 different indigenous nations, declared victory.

[note: several of the hyperlinks are to articles and websites in Spanish.]

Background

Peruvian President Alan Garcia approved more than 100 legislative decrees in the first half of 2008, making use of special powers bestowed upon the Executive branch by the Congress in order to bring the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the US and Peru into effect. The FTA was signed in 2006 and passed – despite opposition – by the US House and Senate in late 2007.

Several of the new laws enacted by Garcia are not directly related to the FTA, including legislative decrees #1015 and #1073. The former facilitated procedures for the fragmentation and sale of communal lands held by indigenous and farming communities in the mountainous (Sierra) and forest (Selva) regions of the country, enabling these crucial decisions to be made in an assembly by a simple majority, instead of the previously required two thirds of communal landowners, thus bringing these regions in line with the procedures of Peru’s coastal region. Decree #1073 makes further modifications to decree #1015.

Laws regarding the control of the land titling process, logging, natural resources and agricultural policy were also among those passed by Garcia earlier this year. Although Peru has ratified the International Labor Organization’s Convention 169 on the Rights of Indigenous and Tribal Peoples, there was no consultation with the indigenous peoples whose territories would be affected by these new laws.

In the months leading up to the most recent mobilizations of the past two weeks, indigenous organizations led a series of protests, press conferences and judicial actions to denounce the new decrees.

Indigenous Occupations

Starting on August 9th, the indigenous movement of the Amazon and of the country in general displayed its power with coordinated occupations of energy and road infrastructure in both southeastern and northern Peru. Occupied sites included a key bridge in Bagua linking the Peruvian amazon to the coast, an oil pipeline owned by State company PetroPeru, a natural gas lot owned by Argentinian company PlusPetrol (key operator in the Camisea mega-project), drilling platforms, a hydroelectric dam, and other important infrastructure.

The indigenous movement’s spokespeople demanded that the government rescind over 30 legislative decrees considered as violatory of indigenous rights, including decrees 1015 and 1073. The government was widely denounced for facilitating mining and energy industry interests in indigenous territory, particularly in the Amazon, via the privatization of communally held lands. Another demand was for consultation with indigenous communities concerning their own views on “development” and relevant legislation.

Government Response

Government attempts to resolve the conflict during the first week of the actions were limited to the executive branch insisting that all occupations cease before establishing a dialogue. On Friday, August 15th, the indigenous rights organization AIDESEP broke off talks with a government commission, questioning the commission’s validity and vowing to continue the occupations. By the following day, another highway blockade and other actions in northeastern Peru had begun.

Meanwhile, declarations questioning and undermining the capabilities and objectives of the indigenous movement abounded in the media. Environmental Minister Antonio Brack warned the public that behind the demonstrations “there is a movement to liberate ancestral indigenous territories, even until they are independent from the Peruvian State.” Peruvian Prime Minister Jorge del Castillo compared the actions to the strategy of the former guerrilla organization Sendero Luminoso (“Shining Path”). Other prominent figures in the Peruvian government and commentators publicly speculated that NGOs, opposition political parties or Chavez must have been behind the actions. Alberto Pizango, leader of and spokesperson for the movement, promptly dismissed these claims.

The second week of continuous actions began with the government’s declaration of a state of emergency in several key areas: the province of Datem del Marañon (Loreto region), Bagua and Utcubamba (Amazonas), and the district of Echarate in the province of La Convención (Cusco). The emergency measures that came into effect on Monday August 18th suspended rights to the freedom of assembly and freedom of movement, and also authorized police to arrest and search without a warrant. The government announced the possible intervention of the Army and Special Forces to end the demonstrations.

Peruvian Prime Minister Jorge del Castillo explained that regions affected by the state of emergency did not entirely correspond to the regions affected by the protests, but that they were limited to regions of key energy infrastructure: an oil pipeline through the northern Amazon region and the Malvinas gas plant – part of the Camisea mega-project – in the south. In a press conference with several Ministers, del Castillo declared that the intention of the state of emergency decree was “not to provoke the communities, but to protect strategic points for energy security.”

Alberto Pizango, however, called the measures “a declaration of open war” against indigenous people who were willing to die in the defense of their territories. He announced that the protests would continue despite the state of emergency and the impending intervention of the armed forces.

The occupations, blockades and protests continued; in fact, others joined in solidarity. A provincial Committee of Struggle in La Convención (Cusco) including a Farmworkers’ Federation announced indefinite actions in support of the communities in the Amazon, including blockades of roads and inter-provincial transportation.

On Tuesday, August 19th, police were first sent to break up the occupation of the Corral Quemado bridge in Bagua, a key transportation link between the Amazon region and the rest of the country. Onsite negotiations between police and protestors led to an agreement that police would not permit the intervention of special forces in the area, and that the 2000 indigenous demonstrators would voluntarily open the bridge to traffic for 24 hours as of 4pm that afternoon.

Resolution in Congress

During the morning of Wednesday, August 20th, an agreement was reached between AIDESEP and President of Congress Javier Velásquez Quesquén. Velásquez promised to convoke an extraordinary plenary session of the Peruvian Congress on Friday, August 22nd, to discuss two issues: the repeal of legislative decrees 1015 and 1073; and the creation of a special multi-Party Commission to study indigenous concerns and issues. He pledged his support for legislative proposal 2440, which would revoke 1015 and 1073. The agreement signed also included an initiative to modify the regulations of Congress procedures themselves in order to include consultation with indigenous peoples, which would incorporate ILO 169 into the legislative process. Finally, the agreement involved an end to the mobilizations and actions.

In the meantime, there was some conflict between indigenous demonstrators and police in Bagua. A larger group of Bagua residents mobilized to support the indigenous demonstrators and gathered outside the local police headquarters. By early Friday morning, there was a strong police presence in Bagua, on local roads and on the Corral Quemado bridge. Residents and indigenous community members, however, were gathering in a plaza to await the outcome of the Congressional session in Lima. Press reported a concentration of some 4000 people in the Heroes of Cenepa plaza in Bagua.

After several hours of discussion and debate, Congress passed legislative decree 2440, repealing decrees 1015 and 1073, by a vote of 66 in favour, 29 against, and no abstentions.

President Alan Garcia maintained his opposition to the overturning of the decrees, an act he categorized as an “historic error.”

AIDESEP leader and indigenous movement spokesperson Alberto Pizango celebrated the decision, declaring, “The people of Peru, indigenous or not, have demonstrated once more that it is possible to reclaim our rights to life, to dignity, and to a lasting sustainable development. This is a new dawn for the Indigenous Peoples of the country.”

[Summary of media reports and information compiled by Sandra Cuffe.]

THE ROAD BEGINS AT THE BOTTOM OF YOUR FEET: The Longest Walk 2 Speaks Out for Mother Earth

The Road Begins at the Bottom of Your Feet:

The Longest Walk 2 Speaks Out for Mother Earth

by Sandra Cuffe, http://thistidehasnoheartbeat.wordpress.com

Cherokee Territory, June 18, 2008.

“Being here, at this very moment – it’s going to be a moment in your history that you’re going to remember for all time,” American Indian Movement (AIM) leader Dennis Banks told Longest Walk 2 participants back in April at the Dooda Desert Rock camp, in the Navajo Nation.

Following in the footsteps of the 1978 AIM Longest Walk for native rights, on February 11th, 2008, the Longest Walk 2 left on a six-month, 4,400-mile walk to Washington, DC, from Alcatraz. The island off the coast of San Francisco, California – former site of the infamous federal prison of the same name – is Ohlone territory and was the site of an historic re-occupation in 1968.

Thirty years after the original Longest Walk, many of the problems facing native communities and nations continue. Many of the concerns raised in 1978, such as the threatened destruction of sacred sites including San Francisco Peaks, are once again being denounced. The 2008 Longest Walk 2 is to protect Mother Earth against destructive industries, pollution, and the devastation of sacred sites. The Walk is also setting an example with the Clean Up Mother Earth campaign, picking up garbage and recyclables all along the way.

The Longest Walk 2 includes two main routes: the northern route, following the path marched by the original 1978 walk; and the southern route. Both began in California and will converge as they near Washington for a three-day Cultural Survival Summit before the official presentation of a Manifesto for Change to the government of the United States on July 11, 2008. The Walk has been traversing the snaking rivers, towering mountain ranges and winding highways through thunderstorms, blazing heat, snow and even a tornado.

In the windy desert in the Navajo Nation, the southern route gathered for a couple days at the Dooda Desert Rock resistance camp. ‘Dooda’ means ‘No’ in the Navajo language, in reference to the grassroots resistance campaign against the proposed Desert Rock coal-fired steam-electric Power Plant. The Dine Power Authority and Houston-based Sithe Global Power are waiting on the air permit decision from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for the project which would, according to local Dine (‘Navajo’) activists, generate air pollution equivalent to 12.5 million cars.

The EPA has one year to determine whether or not to grant a permit, according to federal law; however, the application was made in 2004. At the beginning of June, the EPA filed a consent decree in court declaring that a decision will be made by July 31, 2008, after publishing the file and soliciting public comment. At the same time, however, there has been increasing press coverage about the declining air quality in the area, due in large part to two existing power plants in the region. According to recent news coverage, San Juan County, New Mexico, reached the federal standard for maximum ozone levels this past week. An EPA report stated that in the year 2000 alone, the existing power plants and coal mines in the county released 13 million pounds of toxic chemicals, including sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and airborne mercury.

Dine elders in the areas most directly threatened began organizing in opposition to the proposed power plant in 2003 and the Dooda Desert Rock Committee was created in 2004. A resistance camp has been present near the proposed power plant site for the past few years. The basis of their opposition includes environmental and health concerns, but another principal concern is tha fact that the proposed site for the plant is immediately adjacent to a sacred burial ground.

“We want to make sure this doesn’t happen,” said Elouise Brown, a local Dine community leader at the forefront of the grassroots resistance to the project. She explained that at the beginning, only a small handful of people were involved and that she would be alone out at the site: “I would just sit there and cry and pray.”

Over the last few years, the resistance camp and the campaign have been receiving visitors and supporters such as the Longest Walk 2. Brown explained to the Walk that many others from neighbouring towns and further abroad have also been supporting the Dooda Desert Rock campaign: “They felt that if this was happening in their hometown, they wouldn’t want it going on.”

Dennis Banks explained that he had grown up in a military boarding school and always dreamed of a military career. When he enlisted and was over in Japan, thousands of people would come out every day to protest the expansion of a U.S. military base. The U.S. troops would watch as the Japanese police hit people’s heads “like coconuts.”

“We said they would never win. How could they fight the U.S. government?” asked Banks, comparing the situation to the one facing the local Dine activists opposing the proposed Desert Rock Power Plant. But in Japan, in the end, “they halted. They defeated the U.S. Air Force. […] Now the farmland is booming with crops. On that side, the grass and wheat are growing up through the runways.”

Decades after leaving the armed forces and becoming one the leaders of the American Indian Movement, Banks spoke from the other side of the fence, this time the one surrounding the proposed power plant site, while looking over the spectacular desert in the direction of the sacred burial ground: “This is the way it should be left, just like this. It’s beautiful.”

“It’s almost asinine that archaeologists, anthropologists, mining people… come here and tell the ancestral inhabitants that there are no burial grounds here. […] Their interest is to grab the land.”

“It is being destroyed in the name of economic development, by people who do not live here or care about the area at all,” remarked Don Lindley, a Dine park ranger working at Mesa Verde in the Four Corners area.

He explained that what is occurring today is a continuation of decades and centuries of history. Interested in the resources on and in native lands, the U.S. government imposed the Tribal Council government system beginning in the 1920s. In 1931, despite the fact that the depression was in full swing all over the country, the Livestock Reduction Act was passed and hundreds of cattle belonging to native people were taken away and killed, or herded away and left to decompose.

“While the rest of the United States was waiting in line at soup kitchens, they were over here terrorizing and killing our livestock,” said Lindley, further explaining that from the Act until 1956, white men working for the government rode the range enforcing the livestock quota.

The Dine began protesting the size of the reservation because it was not nearly enough land for their animals to graze. Over the years, the Navajo Nation expanded five times, reaching the edge of the Grand Canyon. In 1956, the U.S. Department of the Interior – under which, ironically, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, the National Park Service, and the Bureau of Land Management (including mining) – established a grazing policy for the Navajo Nation, a key document that is still in force.

With regards to the Department of Interior’s grazing policy, Lindley remarked, “it’s just like the same old house and repainting it and calling it the Navajo Nation.”

He explained that the grazing policy was drafted with these future energy and mining projects in mind; thus, the Bureau of Indian Affairs stands staunchly behind the policy, even though it takes control and autonomy away from the Dine and although their ancestors traveled with their livestock and knew how to manage the land. Lindley added that USDA programs that extend their services to the Navajo Nation are conditional on maintaining the same grazing policy.

Navajo Nation Tribal Council president Joe Shirley, Jr. – part of the Tribal Council system imposed by the U.S. government some 80 years ago, disregarding native government systems around the country that had existed for hundreds and thousands of years – has not opposed neither the Desert Rock Power Plant nor the grazing policy. However, shortly before the Longest Walk 2’s visit to the area, Shirley voiced the Navajo Nation’s clear rejection of uranium mining to a Congressional Sub-Committee hearing in Flagstaff about the ‘Community Impacts of Proposed Uranium Mining Near Grand Canyon National Park.’

An April 30 Tribal Council press release quotes Shirley at the hearing: “We are doing everything we can to speak out and do something about it. We do not want a new generation of babies born with birth defects.We will not allow our people to live with cancers and other disorders as faceless companies make profits only to declare bankruptcy and then walk away from the damage they have caused, regardless of the bond they have in place.”

Uranium mining has been going on for decades in the Navajo Nation, fueling many of the nuclear weapons and nuclear power project in the United States. There has been some attention to the plight of the Dine uranium workers, the affected communities, and the alarming health problems, but instead of working to remedy the existing situation, the government is granting exploration permits for further uranium mining activities in the region.

The press release continues quoting Tribal Council president Shirley at the hearing: “Today, the legacy of uranium mining continues to devastate both the people and the land. The workers, their families, and their neighbors suffer increased incidences of cancers and other medical disorders caused by their exposure to uranium. […] The mines, many simply abandoned, have left open scars in the ground with leaking radioactive waste. The companies that processed the uranium ore dumped their waste in open – and in some cases unauthorized – pits, exposing both the soil and the water to radiation. […] The Navajo people have been consistently lied to by companies and government officials concerning the effects of various mining activities. Unfortunately, the true cost of these activities is understood only later when the companies have stolen away with their profits leaving the Navajo people to bear the health burdens.”

Just over two months after visiting Dooda Desert Rock and walking through the Navajo Nation, the Longest Walk 2 walked to the Y-12 National Security Complex just outside of Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Managed for the National Nuclear Security Administration by Babcock and Wilcox Technical Services Y-12, a private corporation, the Complex has been using uranium from the Navajo Nation, among other places, for decades.

According to the sign in front of Y-12 alongside the road: “The Electromagnetic Separation Plant was a Manhattan Project facility built in 1943 to separate U-235 from U-238. Material for the first atomic bomb was produced here. In place of unavailable copper, nearly 14,000 tons of silver were borrowed from the U.S. Treasury for use on the manufacturing equipment. The plant was constructed by Stone and Webster Engineering and was operated by Tennessee Eastman from 1943-1947.”

Some 30 people walked eight miles on a rest day up to the fence at one of the entrances to the Plant. Eleven security officers in uniform walked down the driveway and watched as the Walk formed a line along the fence facing Y-12 and stood praying, drumming and chanting. Participants from different places, including Hiroshima and the Navajo Nation, shared their prayers with the Walk and the dozen local peace activists who joined them at the Complex.

“We stand against this plant that represents death and destruction,” remarked local peace activist Erik Johnson.

Activists involved with the Oak Ridge Peace and Environmental Alliance (OREPA, www.stopthebombs.org) have been gathering in front of the Y-12 National Security Complex to hold a vigil every Sunday evening for the last seven years. Others have been doing the same every Monday morning for the past five years.

While most people are aware that the bombs contructed at the Y-12 complex and elsewhere were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan by the United States at the end of the Second World War, very few are aware that literally hundreds of these bombs have been dropped on a Nation much closer to home. When asked what they think is the most bombed nation on earth, most people respond Japan, Vietnam, Germany, Lebanon, England, Iraq, or other countries. In fact, the most bombed nation on earth is the Western Shoshone Nation in Nevada, visited by the northern route of the Longest Walk 2.

In 1863, during the Civil War, Americans needed safe passage west to the gold mines in California in order to fund the war. The Treaty of Ruby Valley, a treaty of peace and friendship with the Western Shoshone covering 60 million acres, was written and signed that year. Despite the fact that there was a military camp whose soldiers were engaging in the murder and rape of Western Shoshone community members, and despite the fact that the translator told the Shoshone that if they did not agree they would all be shot, nevertheless the Treaty of Ruby Valley does not cede any territory.

Over the past 150 years, however, settlers and the U.S. government have gradually taken over the vast majority of Western Shoshone territory, leaving only tiny reservations. In 1962, the government of the Unites States established that the Western Shoshone had lost their lands through “gradual encroachment” and a decade later began suing elders for “trespassing” on their own ancestral lands. In 1979, the Indian Claims Commission allotted 26 million dollars for 24 million acres of “lost” Western Shoshone territory, who did not accept the money or the unilateral extinguishment of their Treaty rights.

According to Western Shoshone elder and Western Shoshone Defense Project (www.wsdp.org) founder Carrie Dann, some 90% of the Treaty of Ruby Valley is covered by U.S. government claims. Among these is the huge Nellis Air Force Base in southern Nevada, home to nuclear, biological and chemical warfare testing.From the 1950s through today, there have been over one thousand nuclear explosions at the Nevada Test Site, located within Nellis and also within Western Shoshone territory.

Underground plutonium testing continues at the base. Also, after September 11, 2001, a whole new facility for biological and chemical weapons testing was built on the same base. Plans for the detonation of 700 tons of explosives with a nuclear atomic warhead detonation device in June 2006 were postponed several times due to massive opposition and finally cancelled in July 2007. The exercise at the Nevada Test Site, named “Divine Strake,” would have been the largest open-air chemical explosion ever carried out by the Pentagon.

Carrie Dann recalls the impacts of some of the earlier nuclear tests in the 1970s and particularly after 1976, when “about ten percent of the calf population was deformed in some way or another.” Dann also spoke of the contamination of water in Western Shoshone communities and of health problems such as leukemia, diabetes and birth defects.

The Western Shoshone, their lands, air and water are also affected by the intensive open-pit mining activities in their territory. It is the second biggest gold mining region of the world, with dozens of companies present, including the world’s largest three gold corporations: Barrick Gold, Newmont, and Goldcorp. Baroid Drilling Fluids, a subsidiary of the infamous military industry leader Halliburton, has been mining barite and molybdenum – a metal used in steel alloys with diverse military and industrial uses.

The Western Shoshone Defense Project is currently struggling against Barrick Gold’s attempts to expand the Cortez gold mine in Horse Canyon, a very important sacred site for the Western Shoshone. Barrick announced the gold deposit ‘discovery’ in February of 2003 as one of the largest gold deposits in the United States and has been aggressively attempting to divide and buy the Western Shoshone communities and leaders in the area.

“These big corporations with billions of dollars – that’s who we’re up against,” remarked Larson Bill, a Western Shoshone community leader and Tribal Council member. “It’s kind of amazing that people in the United States, even the Congressmen, don’t know what’s going on out here. They have no clue what’s going on.”

Faced with some of the most destructive industries on the planet, such as the military and mining industries, in the video ‘Our Land, Our Life: The Struggle for Western Shoshone Land Rights’, Carrie Dann emphasizes the roots of the struggles of the Western Shoshone:

The struggle has been for Western Shoshone land rights. It’s always been Western Shoshone land rights. To a traditional indigenous person, land means life. All the things that you have – they all come from this earth.Today they call those things resources. Today those resources are taken in the name of economy, name of money. Who does that? Multinational corporations. They don’t care. They’re not going to be here tomorrow.And what do these companies care about the children of these children? They don’t care! ‘Cause they’ll be gone! Soon as they take the resources out, they will be gone.

Dann also asks all of us if we are prepared “to dedicate ourselves to the next generations to come? Or are we just ready to accept things as they are and to hell with tomorrow, to hell with the future generations? And that is one of the reasons that I try so hard to protect the rights of indigenous peoples all over the world, because they’re the ones still related to the earth. They’re still close to the earth. And they do care.”

These are the questions, issues and struggles to which the Longest Walk 2 is bringing attention, mile by mile, through reservations, towns and cities across the country. All along the way – and from further away through the Longest Walk 2 website, www.longestwalk.org – people of diverse nations, colours and countries have been walking along, making donations of all sorts, sharing their own histories and situations, and welcoming the walk into their nations, communities and homes. A Manifesto for Change to be presented to the United States government is also being compiled along the walk.

Back at Dooda Desert Rock, Dennis Banks insisted that action is the necessary next step after hearing about or witnessing the ongoing injustice and destruction: “That should be an obligation. You should use what you have learned.”

“The road begins at the bottom of your feet.”

* * * * * * * * * *

Sandra Cuffe is an independent journalist, activist, and the descendant of white European settlers. Originally from Vancouver, BC – Coast Salish Territory – she lived in Central America, working on indigenous territory, global mining, political prisoners and other issues for five years. She joined the southern route of the Longest Walk 2 this past June 11th in Chattanooga, Tennessee after a visit to the Walk at the Dooda Desert Rock camp as well as to the Western Shoshone Defense Project in early April 2008.

Feel free to forward, re-post, or otherwise distrubute this article in its entirety. Please contact the author before editing or publishing this article in print.

Author’s blog: http://thistidehasnoheartbeat.wordpress.com

Author’s email: thistidehasnoheartbeat@gmail.com

LONGEST WALK 2: www.longestwalk.org